Sigh. An NYT
article opens "Reversing a decades-long trend toward "global dimming," Earth's surface has become brighter since 1990, scientists are reporting today.", despite the fact that the paper's conclusion "care
must be exercised in the use of potentially
misleading terms like “global warming” (13)
and “global dimming” (14). Their use may
constitute an obstacle in reaching an understanding
of the issues driving the fundamental
scientific questions of Earth’s energy balance,
albedo, greenhouse effect, and interactions
of solar and infrared radiation with
aerosols and clouds."
Partly due to their use of such phrases, I only figured out what the paper really said when I reached in paragraph 4. Granted upon rereading it, I could have figured it out sooner, but the point is that even an unusually well-informed reader was confused for way to long. (I've actually done some related research and compared my models to the observations of Goode et al, the team in references 8 and 9).
The real paper can be found
here.